OFFICIAL
JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT
COMPLAINT
Scroll down page to read a copy of the judicial misconduct complaint filed with
the Judicial Council of the Federal Fifth Circuit. There has been no response yet.
The Council's response will be posted on this site
FLUSHING OUT
THE UGLY TRUTH

ABOUT




SEND THIS LINK
http://outlawjudges.org/judicialcomplaint1.aspx
TO YOUR CONGRESSIONAL REPRESENTATIVES

GET THEIR EMAIL ADDRESS HERE

DEMAND JUDICIAL
ACCOUNTABILITY


August 5, 2009
TO THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
NOTICE AND COMPLAINT OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES IN THE
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE
TO THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT:
This complaint concerns matters of exceptional public importance. It is notice of and a complaint about
criminal acts, actions and activity, by court employees, in the administration of justice in the District Court, For
the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division.
It is also notice of and a complaint about the knowing and intentionally fraudulent and felonious conduct, misfeasance and
nonfeasance in the administration of justice by Circuit Judges Jerry E. Smith, Carl E. Stewart, Leslie H. Southwick and Emilio
M. Garza. These judges have knowingly, intentionally, boldly and blatantly violated their solemn oath of office and the Code
of Judicial conduct. They have engaged in false and fraudulent jurisprudence, obstructed justice and corrupted the operation
of the court and the administration of justice. This is totally unacceptable to the American People!
This knowing and intentional misconduct is clearly prejudicial to the effective, meaningful and expeditious administration of
justice and the business of the courts. It is too important, to the American People and the court, to be ignored. It clearly
violates the Public Trust and erodes public confidence in the integrity and legitimacy of the judiciary and the judicial process.
PLAINLY
All of this requires the Council to promptly exercise its authority and fundamental duty to:
(1) Ensure the honest and legitimate administration of justice within the circuit.
(2) To promote judicial honesty, integrity, transparency, accountability, credibility and public confidence in the courts
among reasonable people.
(3) To protect the public from fraudulent, illegitimate and felonious behavior, by court personnel and judges in the
administration of justice.
(4) To ensure judges are held in strict account to the Constitution, the law, the oath of office and the Code of Judicial Conduct.
(5) To prevent fraud, corruption and tyranny in the administration of justice.
(6) To ensure honest and principled decision-making with transparency, uniformity and predictability.
(7) To create a greater awareness of proper judicial behavior on the part of the judiciary and the public.
(8)To faithfully fulfill the Council’s purpose and delegated duties.
Plainly, the Council has no greater responsibility!
IMPORTANT THRESHOLD FACT
This complaint is not directly related to the merits of a decision or procedural ruling; and, it is not a frivolous complaint.
To the contrary, this is a profoundly legitimate and well documented complaint about criminal acts, actions and conduct in
the administration of justice in the Fifth circuit. Plainly, there are no valid grounds for the dismissal of this complaint under
Rule 11(c) (1) et seq. of the Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings.
Clearly, the scale of corruption in the administration of justice in the Fifth Circuit is simply outrageous and cannot be
tolerated. Misconduct by “outlaw judges” and court employees is a cancer that is destroying the People’s faith and trust
in the integrity and legitimacy of the judiciary and the judicial processes.
THEREFORE
This complaint must be taken seriously, thoroughly investigated and appropriate action taken to protect the public and to
ensure, preserve and protect the Constitution, the law and the full, fair and honest administration of justice in the Fifth Circuit.
BRIEF STATEMENT OF RELEVANT FACTS
The record in case No. 3:07-CV 1457-B in the District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division and the
record in case No. 08-10313; and, No. 08-11137 c/w 08-10313 in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals are included herein
by reference thereto as though they were copied herein word for word.
CRIMINAL ACTS IN DISTRICT COURT
The evidence demonstrates intentional criminal conduct by persons in the Federal District Court in Dallas. I.e.
(1) The intentional, fraudulent and felonious theft, taking away, or otherwise avoiding the duly and timely filed Notice
of Appeal in filed in Case No. 3:07-CV-1457-B in the Federal District Court in Dallas.
(2) The intentional, fraudulent and felonious delay in the acceptance and filing of the Notice of Appeal timely delivered to
the clerk’s office by Certified, Return Receipt U.S. mail in Case No. 3:07-CV-1457-B in the Federal District Court in Dallas.
These criminal acts were for the purpose and intent to obstruction justice.
JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
In Fifth Circuit Case No. 08-10313: The record overwhelmingly establishes that Circuit Judges Smith, Stewart and
Southwick did:
(a) Knowingly and willfully combine, conspire, confederate, and agree with each other to feloniously aid, abet, facilitate and
conceal the criminal acts, actions and conduct in the district court by;
(b) dismissing the appeal even though they had the timely, file marked, Notice of appeal.
(c) The willful and felonious concealing and covering up the criminal acts by failing to perform explicit ministerial and
non-discretionary judicial duties and responsibilities concerning the disturbing web of criminal activity in the administration
of justice in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
However, after complainant submitted a judicial misconduct complaint to the Clerk of the Court of appeals concerning the
criminal activities and the judicial misconduct:
The dismissed appeal was reinstated as appeal No. 08-11137 c/w/ No. 08-10313 and the judicial complaint was never
presented to the Council, because the clerk’s office requested complainant to withdraw the complaint because the appeal
had been reinstated.
COMPLAINT CONTUNUES ON NEXT PAGE:
PLEASE CLICK HERE
Add your content here